56 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
56 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?
If you invest a little time on the slide you will understand it
and may even see it as a thing of beauty. But Masters’ audience was
obviously expecting something different and, presented with this level
of complexity, went into shutdown. Perhaps they wanted a simpler
presentation, a high-level summary, a few bullet points. Of course, there
is no simple presentation on Afghanistan. The lesson is that context,
timing and expectation are often as important to good communication
as the elegance of the content, and that information is a complex thing.
If you want a lighthearted poke at PowerPoint here is Peter Norvig’s
PowerPoint version of the Gettysburg Address.
Understanding
Next time you are in a business meeting, count the number of times the
word ‘understand is used. If you ask the people around you what it means
you'll stump many of them. That’s because understanding has two very
different meanings. Most people don’t separate these meanings but the
distinction is important. Understanding means to decode information,
to comprehend — but, more importantly, it also means to absorb and
internalize information. That feeling you have when you ‘et it’
If I say, “I understand” I mean I have taken in the question you
asked and decoded it into ideas so I can provide an answer. This can be
quite a mechanical process and computers routinely understand natural
language and answer questions — Apple's digital assistant Siri being a
case in point.
When I say, “I understand a problem” or “understand a culture”
I mean something far less tangible. Somehow the information I have
gathered over my life is formed into a matrix within my brain that allows
me to ponder and run scenarios. I can predict the effects of my actions
before I do them, and often anticipate your responses. That’s clearly
a very useful evolutionary adaption, but is there more to it than that?
Roger Penrose and David Deutsch think understanding allows us to
transfer non-symbolic information from one brain to another. We don't
run programs in our brains, nor do we store precise information such as
lists and tables. We have, therefore, had to evolve a creative approach to
communicating skills and understanding each other. One of the most
closely studied areas in the field of communication is when it breaks
down in the lead up to a disaster.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015746
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents