Document

Chart 16: SAN, BNP, ING, ISP and DBK average 6M ATMf implied vol is

Ref IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014981.txt Release House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pages

Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.

View the original on the official release

Document text

Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.

Chart 16: SAN, BNP, ING, ISP and DBK average 6M ATMf implied vol is Chart 17: Despite the recent drop in realized correlation, implied trading historically low (13" percentile since 2008) correlation is priced near the high end of the reaiised range for the basket of EU banks Basket of SAN, BNP, ING, ISP & DBK 5 100% 90% 80% 80% 70% 60% 60% 40% 13th percentile 50% 40% 20% 2 fox oO = N o st ve) © ye 30% ss 8 & &§ B & &B & & ssssssaggeyrgezees = = = FF = FF FF FF ESF Ss <© ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ © & © G&G ©GCe Gc Ge E SSSSSBSSSSSSSSSSS 6M avg realised vol ———=6M avg implied vol = Last IV (16-Jun-17) 3M realised correl ————6M realised correl = Dec17 implied correl Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data: 2-Jan-08 to 16-Jun-17 Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data: 2-Jan-08 to 16-Jun-17 - Attractive risk-reward profile at current pricing: As highlighted in Exhibit 1, historically the trade held to expiry, at current pricing, would have generated an average P&L of 8.4% when positive and -1.8% when negative. The risk-reward looks even more attractive in extreme market outcomes as the max P&L of the trade which is greater than 75% compares to the max loss of only 5.7%. The trade also provides an effective way to gain long exposure to EU equities with limited risks, as evident from the call-like payoff in Exhibit 1 (vs the ESTX50). It is worth noting that, by construction, the maximum loss of the trade is 6.8% with the most likely loss limited to the upfront premium of 1.8%. We also note that the trade payoff profile is superior to a SX5E Dec17 ATM call when sized such that: (i) the call premium is the same as the upfront premium for the dispersion trade (=1.8%, blue line), as well as (ii) when the call premium is the same as the theoretical maximum loss for the trade (=6.8%, orange line). Exhibit 1: Hypothetical back-test of long Dec17 105% call on a basket of SAN, BNP, ING, ISP & DBK, short Dec17 ATM worst-of call on the same basket (upfront premium = 1.8%) 80% ESTX50 6M returns Trade P&L (long basket call, short worst-of} 80% P&L Q, 5 Avg P&L when positive: 8.4% 70% 60% Avg P&L when negative: -1.8% 60% 9g, 40% 50% 40% 20% 30% 20% 0% 10% 20% ty 0% H “10% | SyS5E 4.7x Dect7 ~ATM call 40% rt . SX5E returns Se 7 nN me sy BBP he BD RWBorHT Ne ts Dm -20% oO Oo 2 oO oO 2 oO fon) o ° i 7 i 7 S&S § &§ &§ & & &§ &§ &§ &§ &§ &§ &§ & & & & & -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data: 3-Jan-00 to 16-Jun-17. Back-testing is hypothetical in nature & reflects application of the strategy prior to its introduction. It is not actual performance & is not intended to be indicative of future performance. The two call payoff diagrams shown in the chart correspond to SX5E Dec17 3575 strike call sized such that upfront premium = 1.8% (0.46x notional, blue line, equal to the upfront premium for the trade) and 6.8% (1.7x notional, orange line, equal to potential max loss of the trade) deg oes Bankof America 10 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 20 June 2017 Merrill Lynch HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014981

Have a question about what this document contains?

Ask the documents