Document

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 749 Filed 03/17/17 Page 2 of 9

Ref IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014789.txt Release House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pages

Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.

View the original on the official release

Document text

Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 749 Filed 03/17/17 Page 2 of 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 0000... ccce eects eeescnseneesesseneeeeecenscnseeeceeseeneeesseseeeeneseesteseeeeeeeeneeteaeeees ] I. FED. R. EVID. 405(B) REQUIRES ADMISSION OF ALL SPECIFIC INCIDENTS OF PLAINTIFF LYING OR ENGAGING IN DECEITFUL OR FRAUDULENT CONDUCT 1 A. All allegations or comments made by Plaintiff are “connected to” the alleged defamatory StAtCMENt eee ec cececneeeneceneeeeeeceeeaeenaeenseecseecseceecnaeeneeeeseseeesecnecsteesnsesceeeeeneeeneeereeeneeeaes 4 B. Responses to Enumerated Motions 11 Limine ......ccccccccccccccceceteces cece cessecnseceseseenssssseensensees 6 1. Stories and allegations concerning Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and world leaders are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1) ..00...0.. eee eceeeeeeeeeeeeeeteeneene 6 2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein’s private island twice (Motion in Limine 2)..... 8 FOIA responses and related materials are admissible (Motion in Limine 3).................. 8 io) 4. Louis Freeh’s testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5)....0....0.00ccccccceccecceeeseceeeseeeees 11 6. Evidence Regarding Plaintiff's Sexual History and Reputation is Admissible (Motion in LIMINE 6) occ cece cece cccecccecessccccesssececeseececsseescessueecesseesssseeesstsssessesstessessseserssaeessesaeeess 14 7. Plaintiff cannot prohibit use of words such as “prostitute,” which she used to describe herself, or any other “derogatory” terms that describe her reputation (Motion in Limine TV) cecccccccesesecssesessssesssssessesscssssessesssusssassessessesasesvsesssssssessesseesesssessiecsessessesecsesseeseesesssesseeaes 14 9. Information regarding Plaintiff's criminal history is relevant and admissible evidence when character is an essential element of the claim (Motion in Limine 9)................... 18 10. Evidence concerning school attendance is relevant to Plaintiff's allegations of how she spent her time in 1999 to 2002 (Motion in Limine 10) 00... cccececessceteeetseenes 19 11. Plaintiff put her full childhood history and character at issue (Motion in Limine 11) .. 20 12. Victims Refuse Silence is a sham not-for-profit established to create a claim for defamation per se (Motion in Limine 12)... cece cccsecececssessecsseseeeseeseeeaeenes 20 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014789

Have a question about what this document contains?

Ask the documents