MR. PAGLIUCA: (continued) I don't care about that

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 150 H3VOGIU3 MR. PAGLIUCA: (continued) I don't care about that, but, you know, I mean, we're going to deal with these issues, and we'll deal with them so the timing is of no consequence to me, but I'm not complaining about it, I'm just responding to it. But for those reasons, your Honor, you shouldn't allow anybody to present any adverse inference from these witnesses. They should not just be part of this trial. Thank you. MR. CASSELL: In reply, your Honor, I think you can just see from the upset there what's going to be happening at this trial. This is the direct quote from Mr. Pagliuca. "Fantastical conspiracy". That's going to be the argument from the other side. They're obviously entitled to advance that argument. But that's what Ms. Giuffre is going to need to respond to at the trial. And, of course, the jury will think this is a fantastical conspiracy if Ms. Giuffre doesn't even bring in some of the alleged conspirators such as Epstein, Kellen, and Marcinkova. Now, we'll hear that this is somehow a hearsay issue under 801(d) (2). This is not a hearsay. There are going to be witnesses in the case, questioned and cross examined. So this isn't a question of inadmissible hearsay, this is a question of presenting a witness to the jury. THE COURT: How do you think this evidence is it's going to go in by way of either deposition or the depositions SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011453