leading, they could both be exact opposite questions. The
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
149
H3vlgiu2
leading, they could both be exact opposite questions. The
witnesses would say the Fifth to everything, and then you look
at the jury and you say, okay, now you can impose an adverse
inference against anybody you want to based on the questions
that the lawyers asked. I mean, that's really what this ends
up being, and it's a waste of time, and it is of no evidentiary
significance.
Then the last point, which I'm just going to need to
correct Mr. Cassell on, the plaintiffs were saying somehow that
we were untimely in not designating portions of these
depositions which we believe are wholly inadmissible, and the
point of our reply was, wait a minute, you didn't designate any
of this testimony until after the designation date was over.
(Continued on next page)
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011452
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents