they're going to say if we don't have an opportunity to present
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
143
H3vlgiu2
they're going to say if we don't have an opportunity to present
them to the jury.
The Court will recall the extraordinary lengths to
which Ms. Giuffre had to go to procure their testimony. They
finally were able to secure it, and they should be presented.
Also -- I think you'll be hearing these issues next
week we used some leading questions during the deposition.
We tried to also use some nonleading. Leading questions can be
used when? When you have a witness who's associated with the
party on the other side. Well, we said they're ina
conspiracy. I can't imagine a case where there would be a
clearer example of when leading questions would be appropriate.
The final argument they made, I think last night in
their late replies was that we somehow missed the deadline in
taking their deposition. What they don't disclose I think in
their papers is, your Honor will recall that we had to come to
you, obtain an application for alternative service, and then,
as a result of that, they came in. We did all these things
with the Court's blessing and approval of taking depositions.
Those schedules were discussed with opposing counsel. And as
soon as we'd taken the deposition, within approximately a week,
we provided the designations. That was back in February of
this year. There's no prejudice.
So for all these reasons, we would ask that we be
allowed to present two of the co-conspirators in the witness
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011446
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents