Document

into consideration whether she could have sued six people for

Ref IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011320.txt Release House Oversight Committee — Epstein Estate Records (Nov 2025) 1 pages

Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.

View the original on the official release

People & organizations named in this document

Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.

Document text

Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 1) H3VOGIU1 into consideration whether she could have sued six people for it, 20 other people for it, this case is about Maxwell and her defamation against my client. So again, your Honor, if you look at Sack on Defamation, it addresses that directly, and we believe that that should not come into evidence. So your Honor, that's the first chunk of the omnibus motion that I was addressing. I'm not sure how you want to take it, if you want to have opposing counsel speak on those issues now and then move to the others, or if you want us to keep moving through it? THI 1a COURT: What's your preference? MS. McCAWLEY: I think keep moving through it would be great. THE COURT: What? Gl MS. McCAWLEY: To keep moving it through it, if that's all right, so we can get through argument and then have them address it? THE, COURT: Sure. MS. McCAWLEY: Thank you, your Honor. MS. SCHULTZ: Your Honor, this is Meredith Schultz for the plaintiff. The next article in the omnibus motion is to exclude testimony references to prior sexual assault. This is an issue that I spoke on yesterday related to another motion regarding the same, so I'll keep it brief. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011320

Have a question about what this document contains?

Ask the documents