into consideration whether she could have sued six people for
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releasePeople & organizations named in this document
Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.
Document text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
1)
H3VOGIU1
into consideration whether she could have sued six people for
it, 20 other people for it, this case is about Maxwell and her
defamation against my client.
So again, your Honor, if you look at Sack on
Defamation, it addresses that directly, and we believe that
that should not come into evidence.
So your Honor, that's the first chunk of the omnibus
motion that I was addressing. I'm not sure how you want to
take it, if you want to have opposing counsel speak on those
issues now and then move to the others, or if you want us to
keep moving through it?
THI
1a
COURT: What's your preference?
MS. McCAWLEY: I think keep moving through it would be
great.
THE COURT: What?
Gl
MS. McCAWLEY: To keep moving it through it, if that's
all right, so we can get through argument and then have them
address it?
THE, COURT: Sure.
MS. McCAWLEY: Thank you, your Honor.
MS. SCHULTZ: Your Honor, this is Meredith Schultz for
the plaintiff. The next article in the omnibus motion is to
exclude testimony references to prior sexual assault. This is
an issue that I spoke on yesterday related to another motion
regarding the same, so I'll keep it brief.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011320
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents