client made statements about. So we were trying to streamline
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releasePeople & organizations named in this document
Being named here is not an accusation of wrongdoing.
Document text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
H3VOGIU1
client made statements about. So we were trying to streamline
the case to the statements about Maxwell and her involvement
with Epstein.
So in the omnibus motion you'll see, for example, that
they have claimed she's made statements about other
individuals, and we say that that's not what's at issue, what's
at issue are the statements
=
THE COURT: That may be an issue of credibility. That
may be an issue of credibility. I'm talking about what we're
going to go to the jury on.
MS. McCAWLEY: Yes. And that is the statements that
Maxwell made about my client.
THE COURT: And that's it.
MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor.
THE COURT: Let me ask the defense. Does that clarify
anything for you?
MS. MENNINGER: Could I have one second, your Honor?
THI
1a
COURT Sure. Of course.
MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think it's slightly more
nuanced. Plaintiff has claimed our client's statement is
false. Our client's statement is not just limited to the
little snippets that they included in their complaint, it's the
ntire statement. That entire statement talks about Virginia
Giuffre's allegations against Ms. Maxwell have been proven
untrue.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011307
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents