Where Keynes and Kuznets and macroeconomic tradition have been right is in
Epstein Suite indexes the text; the original document lives at its official source. We don't host the original file — view it on the official release to read it in full.
View the original on the official releaseDocument text
Text is machine OCR and may contain errors. Confirm against the original source above.
Where Keynes and Kuznets and macroeconomic tradition have been right is in
reasoning that pay and gross profit, meaning gross of depreciation, sum to the
“expenditure” spent on consumption and gross investment. This fact of arithmetic is
the logic behind Say’s law: pay plus profit are always enough to buy what is
produced. We saw that this truism gives cold comfort when calamity or
misjudgment make profit negative, as with the subprime houses of 2008. What it
certifies, anyhow, is
expenditure = pay + gross profit = consumption + gross investment. (6.21)
We can subtract depreciation to reach
pay + profit = consumption + investment. (6.22)
Now (6.19) can be corrected as a whole to show
income = pay + profit + self-invested work - human depreciation
= output
= consumption - investment + self-invested work
— human depreciation. (6.23)
My main goal in this book has been to further the work of Solow in exogenizing
growth, and also the work of Ben-Porath in endogenizing human capital as
something produced within the economy. It was in that spirit that I derived the Y
rule in Chapters 2 and 5 by putting human capital inside. I reached
output = investment + human capital growth + cash flow.
Here “ex post net” is understood before output and investment, so that investment
means physical capital growth. (6.16) applies the growth truism to human capital.
The cash flow truism shows that cash flow is net transfer plus exhaust realized in
Chapter 6: Parallels with the Firm 2/4/16 23
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011057
Have a question about what this document contains?
Ask the documents